Care Programme Approach (CPA) Documentation for Psychologists (UK)

International|13 min read|Updated 2026-03-20|Clinically reviewed

What Is the Care Programme Approach?

The Care Programme Approach (CPA) is a framework used in NHS mental health services in England to coordinate care for people with complex mental health needs. Introduced in 1991 and refined in 2008 under "Refocusing the Care Programme Approach," CPA provides a structured process for assessing needs, developing care plans, allocating a care coordinator, and reviewing care at regular intervals.

CPA applies to patients who have complex, multiple needs that require input from several professionals or agencies — for example, a person with treatment-resistant psychosis who requires input from a psychiatrist, psychologist, community psychiatric nurse, social worker, and supported housing provider. The framework ensures that these multiple inputs are coordinated rather than fragmented, that the patient has a single named point of contact (the care coordinator), and that care is regularly reviewed in a formal multi-professional meeting.

For psychologists working in community mental health teams (CMHTs), crisis teams, early intervention in psychosis services, or specialist personality disorder services, CPA is a routine part of clinical practice. Your psychological input — formulation, therapy, risk assessment — sits within a broader care package that is documented and reviewed through the CPA framework. Understanding how to contribute effectively to CPA documentation is essential for integrated care delivery.

While some NHS trusts are transitioning to newer care coordination models under the community mental health framework, the principles of CPA — coordinated assessment, documented care planning, named professional responsibility, and regular review — remain central to good practice for complex cases.

When You Need It

You will engage with CPA documentation in these situations:

  • When a patient on your caseload is under CPA — you are expected to contribute psychological updates to CPA reviews and maintain clinical records that inform the care plan
  • When you are the care coordinator — you are responsible for the care plan, review meetings, and coordination of all services involved in the patient's care
  • CPA review meetings — formal multi-professional reviews where the care plan is evaluated and updated
  • Care plan development — contributing psychological formulation and treatment goals to the integrated care plan
  • Crisis and contingency planning — contributing to the development of crisis plans that document warning signs, coping strategies, and emergency contacts
  • Discharge from CPA — when a patient's needs have reduced to the point where CPA-level coordination is no longer required, and they can step down to standard care
  • Transitions — when a patient is transferring between teams (e.g., from inpatient to community, or from one CMHT to another), CPA documentation facilitates continuity

Key Components / Requirements

CPA Care Plan

The CPA care plan is the central document. It should include:

  • Patient details — name, NHS number, date of birth, GP, next of kin, and any communication needs
  • Care coordinator details — name, role, contact information, and team
  • Assessed needs — a comprehensive assessment of the patient's mental health, physical health, social, housing, financial, occupational, and relational needs
  • Goals — collaboratively agreed goals that the patient is working toward, written in the patient's own words where possible
  • Interventions and responsible professionals — what each professional or service is providing, how often, and what they are aiming to achieve
  • Risk assessment and management plan — current risk formulation, identified risk factors and protective factors, and the management plan
  • Crisis and contingency plan — what to do if the patient's mental health deteriorates, including early warning signs, coping strategies, who to contact, and crisis service details
  • Medication — current medication, prescriber, and any medication-related monitoring requirements
  • Review date — the date of the next CPA review
  • Patient and carer involvement — documentation that the patient (and carer, where relevant) has been involved in care plan development and has received a copy

Psychologist's Contribution to the Care Plan

As the treating psychologist, your specific contributions to the care plan include:

Psychological formulation: A concise formulation that explains the patient's difficulties in psychological terms — predisposing factors, precipitating factors, perpetuating factors, and protective factors. This formulation should be accessible to the whole team, not just psychologists.

Psychological treatment plan: What therapy you are providing, the modality, the frequency, the goals of therapy, and the expected duration. This should align with the overall care plan goals.

Outcome measures: Current scores on relevant standardised measures (e.g., CORE-OM, PHQ-9, HONOS, BPRS) and comparison with previous scores.

Risk observations from therapy: Any risk information that has emerged in therapy sessions — disclosures of suicidal ideation, self-harm, substance use, or safeguarding concerns. This information must be shared with the care coordinator and documented appropriately.

CPA Review Documentation

CPA reviews are formal meetings that bring together the patient, their care coordinator, and all involved professionals. The review documentation should include:

  • Attendees — who was present and who sent apologies (with any written contributions from absent professionals)
  • Review of each care plan area — progress against goals, changes in need, and any new issues
  • Updated risk assessment — has risk changed since the last review? Are new risk factors present? Have protective factors changed?
  • Decisions made — changes to the care plan, new referrals, changes in medication, changes in professional involvement
  • Actions — specific tasks allocated to specific professionals with timescales
  • Patient and carer views — documented input from the patient and their carer about what is working, what is not, and what they want to change
  • Next review date

Crisis and Contingency Plan

Every CPA patient should have a crisis and contingency plan that is developed collaboratively with the patient and shared with all relevant professionals. As a psychologist, you contribute to this plan by identifying psychological early warning signs (e.g., withdrawal from activities, increased rumination, paranoid thinking), psychological coping strategies the patient has developed in therapy, and any therapy-specific information relevant to crisis management (e.g., DBT skills the patient can use, grounding techniques for dissociation).

CPA Review Summary — Psychology Contribution

CPA Review Meeting Record

Patient: Ms Danielle Brooks (NHS No: 456 789 0123) Date of Review: 28/02/2026, 14:00–15:15 Venue: Meeting Room 2, Oakwood CMHT Care Coordinator: Mark Hughes, CPN Chair: Mark Hughes

Attendees:

  • Ms Danielle Brooks (patient)
  • Ms Linda Brooks (mother, with patient's consent)
  • Mark Hughes, CPN (care coordinator)
  • Dr Anwar Hussain, Consultant Psychiatrist
  • Dr Emily Carter, Clinical Psychologist
  • Joanne West, Social Worker
  • Apologies: Kevin Murray, Support Worker (written update provided)

Patient Details: DOB: 12/10/1995 | GP: Dr L. Sharma, Riverside Surgery | Diagnosis: Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder (ICD-11 6D10.Z), Recurrent Depressive Disorder (ICD-11 6A71)

Summary Since Last Review (September 2025):

Psychiatry (Dr Hussain): Danielle's medication has been stable since October 2025 — quetiapine 300mg nocte, sertraline 150mg. She attended 4 of 5 scheduled psychiatry appointments. Her mood has been more stable with fewer significant dips, though she continues to experience brief intense emotional episodes typically lasting 2 to 4 hours. No medication changes recommended at this time.

Psychology (Dr Carter): Danielle has attended 18 of 22 offered individual therapy sessions since the last CPA review. Treatment has been structured Schema Therapy, focusing on the Abandoned Child and Punitive Parent modes identified in formulation. Progress has been meaningful in several areas. Danielle can now identify when she is in "Punitive Parent mode" (self-critical, self-punishing cognitions) approximately 70% of the time and can use the "mode flip" technique to access the Healthy Adult mode, though this remains effortful and inconsistent under interpersonal stress. Her self-harm has reduced from an average of 3 episodes per month at the start of therapy (January 2025) to approximately 1 episode per month over the past 3 months. The most recent episode (7 February 2026) was lower in severity than previous episodes and Danielle sought support from the crisis line rather than presenting to A&E, which represents a significant change in her crisis response pattern. CORE-OM clinical score has reduced from 2.8 (assessment) to 1.9 (February 2026), showing reliable improvement. PHQ-9 has reduced from 21 to 13. She continues to struggle with interpersonal relationships — a pattern of idealisation followed by rapid devaluation in friendships remains a significant source of distress and a core focus of ongoing therapy.

Recommendation: Continue weekly Schema Therapy for a further 6 months (approximately 24 sessions). The interpersonal pattern work is entering a critical phase and premature ending would risk loss of therapeutic gains.

Social Work (Ms West): Danielle's housing remains stable. Benefits review was completed in November — PIP award maintained at standard rate daily living. No current safeguarding concerns. Supported Danielle with a referral to a peer support group for women with personality disorder diagnoses, which she has attended twice and reports finding "helpful but scary."

Support Worker (written update from Mr Murray): Kevin reports that Danielle has been engaging well with weekly community access sessions. She has attended a local art class on three occasions and is considering continuing. She remains socially isolated outside of her professional support network and her mother.

Risk Review:

Current risk level: Moderate (unchanged from last review)

Risk factors: History of self-harm (cutting — frequency reducing), past overdose (2023), emotionally unstable personality disorder diagnosis, social isolation, abandonment schema (risk increases when key relationships are threatened)

Protective factors: Engaged in therapy and making progress, good relationship with care coordinator and psychologist, supportive mother, self-harm frequency reducing, improved crisis response pattern (using crisis line rather than A&E)

Change since last review: Self-harm frequency has reduced. Crisis response pattern has improved. No A&E presentations since August 2025 (previously averaging one every 6 to 8 weeks). Overall risk trajectory is positive but remains moderate given the chronic nature of her presentation and the potential for rapid deterioration under interpersonal stress.

Updated Crisis and Contingency Plan:

  • Early warning signs: Withdrawal from appointments, stopping art class, increased phone contact with crisis line (more than 3 times per week), breaking off contact with mother
  • Coping strategies: Mode identification and "mode flip" technique (Schema Therapy), ice-holding distress tolerance skill, calling crisis line, contacting care coordinator
  • Crisis contacts: Mark Hughes (care coordinator) 9–5 weekdays; Oakwood CMHT duty worker 9–5 weekdays; NHS 111 option 2 out of hours; A&E if immediate risk to life

Decisions:

  1. Continue CPA — Danielle's needs remain complex and multi-professional
  2. Continue current medication regimen — reviewed by Dr Hussain, no changes
  3. Continue weekly Schema Therapy with Dr Carter for 6 months (next review to assess ongoing need)
  4. Danielle to continue peer support group attendance with support from Kevin (support worker)
  5. Ms West to explore referral to Recovery College for vocational activity

Actions:

ActionResponsibleTimescale
Continue weekly therapy sessionsDr CarterOngoing
Explore Recovery College optionsMs WestBy 31/03/2026
Support attendance at peer group and art classKevin MurrayOngoing
Review medication in 3 monthsDr HussainMay 2026
Send updated care plan to GPMark HughesBy 07/03/2026
Provide copy of updated care plan to Danielle and her motherMark HughesBy 07/03/2026

Patient Views: Danielle said she feels "things are slowly getting better" and that therapy is "the hardest thing I've ever done but I can see it's working." She wants to continue with Dr Carter and does not want any changes to her support right now. She expressed interest in the Recovery College and asked Ms West to help her explore options.

Carer Views: Ms Brooks said she has noticed Danielle is "calmer and more able to talk about things instead of just reacting." She remains concerned about Danielle's social isolation and is pleased about the peer support group. She asked about what would happen if Dr Carter left the service — this was discussed with reassurance about continuity planning.

Next CPA Review: August 2026 (6 months), or sooner if clinically indicated.

Record completed by: Mark Hughes, CPN (Care Coordinator) Countersigned by: Dr Anwar Hussain, Consultant Psychiatrist

This is a sample for educational purposes only — not real patient data.

How to Write It

Step 1: Prepare a written update before the CPA review. Even if you will attend the meeting in person, prepare a concise written summary of your psychological input since the last review. This ensures your contribution is documented accurately even if the person writing the review minutes summarises it differently.

Step 2: Frame your contribution for a multidisciplinary audience. Your CPA update should be understandable to the whole team — psychiatrists, nurses, social workers, support workers, and the patient. Avoid unexplained psychological jargon. Translate your formulation into accessible language and describe therapy progress in concrete, behavioural terms.

Step 3: Include outcome measure data. Quantitative data strengthens your contribution and allows the team to track progress objectively. Report current scores, comparison with previous scores, and whether reliable change has been achieved.

Step 4: Address risk from a psychological perspective. As a psychologist, you have unique insights into the patient's risk — you understand the psychological mechanisms that drive risk behaviour, the interpersonal triggers, and the internal experiences that precede crises. Contribute this understanding to the team's risk formulation.

Step 5: Make clear recommendations. State explicitly what you recommend — continuing therapy at the current frequency, increasing or decreasing frequency, changing the treatment focus, or planning for ending. Provide the clinical rationale for your recommendation.

Step 6: Contribute to the crisis plan. Ensure the crisis plan reflects the psychological skills and strategies the patient has developed in therapy. If the patient has learned DBT distress tolerance skills, grounding techniques, or cognitive coping strategies, these should be named in the crisis plan so that crisis workers can prompt the patient to use them.

Common Mistakes

  • Not providing a written contribution. If you attend the review but do not provide a written update, your input depends on how accurately someone else captures it in the minutes. Submit a written summary that can be filed in the patient's record.
  • Writing an update that only a psychologist would understand. CPA is a multidisciplinary framework. If your update references "schema modes" or "mentalisation capacity" without explanation, the CPN, social worker, and patient will not benefit from your contribution.
  • Not attending CPA reviews. Psychology input is valuable in CPA reviews, and absence means the psychological perspective is not represented in care planning decisions. If you cannot attend, provide a comprehensive written update and ensure the care coordinator receives it before the meeting.
  • Failing to share risk information with the care coordinator. If a patient discloses new risk information in a therapy session (suicidal ideation, self-harm, substance use, safeguarding concerns), this must be communicated to the care coordinator — not held in the therapy room until the next CPA review. Timely risk communication is a professional obligation.
  • Not involving the patient in care plan development. CPA is built on the principle of patient involvement. The patient should be present at the review (unless there are exceptional reasons otherwise), should have input into their care plan goals, and should receive a copy of the updated care plan.
  • Treating CPA documentation as separate from clinical work. CPA documentation is not administrative overhead — it is the clinical framework within which your therapy sits. Your therapy goals should align with the CPA care plan goals, and your therapy progress should be reflected in care plan updates.

Writing a clinical document right now?

My Clinical Writer helps you generate clinical documents from your session details in under 60 seconds.

Try My Clinical Writer Free →

myclinicalwriter.ai

Frequently Asked Questions

External Resources

Authoritative references and tools related to this documentation type.

Stop spending hours on documentation

My Clinical Writer uses AI to help you draft clinical notes, treatment plans, and reports in minutes — not hours.

Get Started at myclinicalwriter.ai →